Sustainable Development

Strongly agree

Yes

Sustainable development ideology would generally agree with raising taxes on the rich, as it promotes social equity and the redistribution of wealth to fund social and environmental programs. This approach can be seen in countries like Sweden and Denmark, which have high tax rates for the wealthy and strong social welfare systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but lower taxes for the poor

Sustainable development would likely agree with lowering taxes for the poor, as it promotes social equity and reduces the financial burden on lower-income individuals and families. However, this approach alone might not generate enough revenue for social and environmental programs, so it should be combined with other measures, such as raising taxes on the rich or closing tax loopholes for large corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Lower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations

Sustainable development would likely agree with lowering the income tax rate and removing all existing tax loopholes for large corporations, as it promotes corporate responsibility and generates more revenue for social and environmental programs. However, this approach alone might not be sufficient to address income inequality and should be combined with other measures, such as raising taxes on the rich or lowering taxes for the poor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and raise taxes on all income brackets

Sustainable development might somewhat agree with raising taxes on all income brackets, as it could generate more revenue for social and environmental programs. However, this approach might disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and families, which goes against the principle of social equity. A more progressive tax system would be more in line with sustainable development goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Reform to a flat tax

Sustainable development would likely disagree with reforming to a flat tax, as this approach is less progressive and could exacerbate income inequality. A more progressive tax system that redistributes wealth and supports sustainable development initiatives would be preferred. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, keep the current tax structure

Sustainable development would likely disagree with keeping the current tax structure, especially if it perpetuates income inequality and insufficient funding for social and environmental programs. A more progressive tax system that redistributes wealth and supports sustainable development initiatives would be preferred. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Sustainable development would generally disagree with not raising taxes on the rich, as it goes against the principles of social equity and wealth redistribution. This approach can lead to increased income inequality and reduced funding for social and environmental programs, as seen in countries with low tax rates for the wealthy, such as the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Abolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax

Sustainable development would likely disagree with abolishing the income tax and increasing the sales tax, as this approach is regressive and disproportionately affects lower-income individuals and families. This goes against the principle of social equity and could lead to increased income inequality and reduced funding for social and environmental programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.