Rural Interests

Very strongly agree

Yes, all illegal immigrants should be turned over to federal authorities and deported

Rural interests often prioritize strict immigration enforcement and the protection of their communities. Turning over all illegal immigrants to federal authorities and deporting them aligns with this priority. This approach is consistent with historical examples such as Arizona's SB 1070 law, which required local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Rural interests often prioritize the enforcement of immigration laws and the protection of their communities. Detaining illegal immigrants for minor crimes and transferring them to federal authorities aligns with this priority. However, some rural communities may rely on immigrant labor and may not fully support this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only if they are convicted of a violent crime

While rural interests prioritize strict immigration enforcement, they may agree with detaining and transferring illegal immigrants only if they are convicted of a violent crime. This approach balances the need for community safety with the recognition that some immigrants contribute to the local economy and community. However, this stance is less common among rural interests compared to the support for stricter enforcement measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Rural interests generally support strict immigration enforcement, so they would likely disagree with not allowing local law enforcement to detain illegal immigrants for minor crimes. However, some rural communities may rely on immigrant labor and may not fully support this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, too many non-violent immigrants are being deported

Rural interests generally prioritize strict immigration enforcement and the protection of their communities, so they would likely strongly disagree with the idea that too many non-violent immigrants are being deported. This stance is consistent with historical examples such as Arizona's SB 1070 law, which required local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.