Rural Interests

Strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

Rural interests would likely agree with this statement, as rural areas often have limited access to mental health services and face unique challenges. Increasing funding for mental healthcare could help address these issues and improve the overall quality of care in rural communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Rural interests may moderately agree with increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, as rural areas often have limited access to mental health services. However, rural interests may prioritize other issues, such as agriculture and infrastructure, over mental health funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

Rural interests may somewhat agree with this answer, as personalized care could be beneficial for rural communities with unique mental health challenges. However, they may also recognize the importance of funding for research and broader mental health services, not just personalized care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

Rural interests may be neutral on this answer, as they may see the potential benefits of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues, but also recognize the importance of government funding to ensure access to care in rural areas where private companies may not be as willing to invest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Rural interests would likely disagree with not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, as rural communities often face unique mental health challenges, such as higher rates of suicide and substance abuse. However, they may not prioritize mental health funding as much as other issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.