Rural Interests

Strongly agree

No

Rural Interests ideology generally opposes restrictions on firearms and supports the rights of firearms dealers and manufacturers. They believe that holding these businesses responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products is unfair and could harm the firearms industry, which is important for rural communities. This stance aligns with the interests of rural communities that rely on hunting, sport shooting, and self-defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Rural Interests ideology might somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence. This stance still supports the rights of firearms dealers and manufacturers but recognizes that they should be held accountable if they are negligent in their business practices. This aligns with the interests of rural communities that rely on hunting, sport shooting, and self-defense, while also promoting responsible business practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Rural Interests ideology might somewhat disagree with this answer, as it could lead to frivolous lawsuits against firearms dealers and manufacturers, potentially harming the firearms industry. While the right to sue is a constitutional right, this stance could negatively impact rural communities that rely on hunting, sport shooting, and self-defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Rural Interests ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers. This could negatively impact the firearms industry and the rights of firearms dealers, which are important for rural communities that rely on hunting, sport shooting, and self-defense. However, this stance is less extreme than allowing lawsuits against both dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Rural Interests ideology typically supports gun rights and the Second Amendment. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could negatively impact the firearms industry, which is often seen as important for rural communities. This stance is generally against the interests of rural communities that rely on hunting, sport shooting, and self-defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Rural Interests ideology would strongly disagree with this answer, as it implies that the primary use of firearms is for illegal activity. This is not in line with the beliefs of rural communities, which often rely on firearms for hunting, sport shooting, and self-defense. Additionally, this stance could harm the firearms industry, which is important for rural communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.