This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
7% Yes |
93% No |
7% Yes |
93% No |
See how support for each position on “Criminal Justice Use of AI” has changed over time for 1.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Criminal Justice Use of AI” has changed over time for 1.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9L4Z23B 2wks2W
No, not yet. More studies need to be conducted first
@9MKD8QM2wks2W
ASBOLUTELY NOT, and AI is not a person NOR a PEER which would be making a mockery of our legal system which is already plagued by several other issues.
@9MNY3TS1wk1W
Yes, but only for supplemental research and aiding in decision making. It should not be the final answer
@9KWXHJM 2wks2W
No, and impose strict regulations on the use of AI in all law systems
@9MN89262wks2W
Yes, but not to issue rulings and sentences, only to collect all potentially relevant case files and precedents so every defendant has a more fair trial overall.
@9MN5L4R2wks2W
No, because it is unethical and violated amendment rights
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
