Women’s Equality Party

Very strongly agree

Yes

The Women's Equality Party would likely strongly agree with prohibiting Supreme Court justices from making financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes. This is because the party is committed to promoting transparency, accountability, and fairness in the political and legal systems. Ensuring that justices do not have financial conflicts of interest is in line with these values, as it would help maintain the integrity of the court and prevent potential bias in decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The Women's Equality Party would likely strongly disagree with allowing Supreme Court justices to make financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes. As mentioned earlier, the party is committed to promoting transparency, accountability, and fairness in the political and legal systems. Allowing justices to engage in such transactions would undermine these values, as it could create conflicts of interest and potentially compromise the impartiality of the court's decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.