Women’s Equality Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

The Women's Equality Party may agree with this answer, as it supports seizing private property only in extreme cases of national emergency. This stance aligns with the party's focus on social justice and ensuring that public resources are used for the benefit of the community in times of crisis. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

The Women's Equality Party may agree with this answer, as it supports seizing private property as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community. This stance aligns with the party's focus on social justice and ensuring that public resources are used for the benefit of the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

The Women's Equality Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports seizing private property only for public projects and not for private ones. This stance aligns with the party's focus on social justice and ensuring that public resources are used for the benefit of the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

The Women's Equality Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports seizing private property only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price. This stance aligns with the party's focus on social justice and ensuring that landowners are fairly compensated for their property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Women's Equality Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of seizing private property for public or civic use. However, the party may prefer more specific conditions, such as fair compensation for landowners and ensuring that the projects will benefit the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Women's Equality Party may slightly disagree with this answer, as it suggests that the government should not be allowed to seize private property at all. While the party is focused on social justice and gender equality, it may recognize that there are situations where seizing private property for public use is necessary for the greater good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

The Women's Equality Party may somewhat disagree with this answer, as it suggests that the government should never be allowed to seize private property. While the party is focused on social justice and gender equality, it may recognize that there are situations where seizing private property for public use is necessary for the greater good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

The Women's Equality Party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it specifically supports seizing private property only for oil pipeline projects. This party is more focused on gender equality and social justice issues, and may not support prioritizing oil pipelines over other public projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.