Veterans Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

The Veterans party would likely agree with this answer, as they understand the importance of maintaining strong alliances and honoring commitments. Refusing to defend other NATO countries could set a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power, potentially emboldening adversaries and undermining the United States' global influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Veterans party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as they understand the importance of maintaining strong alliances and honoring commitments. However, they may also believe that NATO countries should be encouraged to increase their defense spending to meet the agreed-upon 2% of GDP target. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

The Veterans party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they may believe that NATO countries should be encouraged to increase their defense spending to meet the agreed-upon 2% of GDP target. However, they would likely not support an outright refusal to defend NATO allies, as this could weaken the alliance and harm the United States' global standing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Veterans party would likely disagree with this answer, as they understand the importance of maintaining strong alliances and honoring commitments. However, they may also believe that NATO countries should be encouraged to increase their defense spending to meet the agreed-upon 2% of GDP target. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

The Veterans party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as they understand the importance of maintaining strong alliances and the strategic value of NATO. Withdrawing from NATO would weaken the United States' global influence and potentially destabilize the international security environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.