No Labels Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The No Labels party emphasizes the importance of transparency, accountability, and integrity in government. They would likely agree that Supreme Court justices should be prohibited from making financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes to avoid any potential conflicts of interest and maintain the impartiality of the court. However, as they have not explicitly stated this position, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the No Labels party's emphasis on transparency and accountability in government, they would likely disagree with the idea that Supreme Court justices should be allowed to make financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes. Such transactions could potentially compromise the impartiality of the court and undermine public trust in the judicial system. However, as they have not explicitly stated this position, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.