ChatGPTYes, but only by closing the gun show loophole |
No Labels’ answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole
Closing the gun show loophole is a moderate policy that could garner bipartisan support, which aligns with No Labels' mission. Therefore, they might support this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only for criminals and the mentally ill
No Labels might support restrictions for criminals and the mentally ill as a moderate, bipartisan approach to gun control. This is a common-sense measure that could garner support from both sides of the aisle. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
No Labels is a political organization that promotes bipartisan problem-solving. While they don't have a specific stance on gun control, they generally support moderate policies, which could include some additional restrictions on gun purchases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes
Increasing penalties for gun-related crimes could be part of a moderate, bipartisan approach to gun control that No Labels might support. However, they have not specifically advocated for this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training
No Labels might support stricter background checks, psychological testing, and training as part of a moderate, bipartisan approach to gun control. However, they have not specifically advocated for this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, only for assault weapons
No Labels might support some restrictions on assault weapons as part of a moderate, bipartisan approach to gun control. However, they have not specifically advocated for this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
No Labels tends to support moderate policies and bipartisan solutions, which could include some additional restrictions on gun purchases. Therefore, they would likely not fully agree with no further restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law
No Labels is a centrist organization that seeks to bridge the gap between Republicans and Democrats. A national 'stand your ground' law is a more conservative policy, so No Labels would likely not strongly support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all guns from public use
Banning all guns from public use is a more extreme policy that No Labels, as a centrist organization, would likely not support. They tend to favor moderate, bipartisan solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
No Labels Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 588 voters that identify as No Labels.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to No Labels’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
