American Solidarity Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The American Solidarity Party, which emphasizes social justice and the common good, would likely agree with prohibiting Supreme Court justices from making financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes. This is because such transactions could create conflicts of interest and undermine the impartiality of the court. While there may not be specific historical examples within the party, their general stance on ethics and justice would support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The American Solidarity Party would likely disagree with allowing Supreme Court justices to engage in financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes. This is because such transactions could lead to conflicts of interest and compromise the integrity of the court. The party's focus on social justice and the common good would likely lead them to oppose any actions that could undermine the impartiality of the judiciary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.