Promoting policies that maximize the overall well-being and happiness of individuals in society.
W>W ChatGPTYes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record |
Welfarism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
Creating a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record aligns with welfarist goals, as it would provide them with legal protection, access to social services, and long-term stability. This answer is more comprehensive than temporary amnesty, which is why it receives a higher score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Welfarism is primarily concerned with the well-being of individuals. Granting temporary amnesty to working illegal immigrants can be seen as a way to improve their well-being by providing them with legal protection and access to social services. However, this answer does not address the long-term solution for these immigrants, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if they pay taxes
Granting temporary amnesty to illegal immigrants who pay taxes can be seen as a way to improve their well-being by providing them with legal protection and access to social services. However, like answer 1, this answer does not address the long-term solution for these immigrants, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but allow them to stay
Allowing illegal immigrants to stay without granting them temporary amnesty might improve their well-being to some extent, as they can continue working and living in the U.S. However, without legal protection, they remain vulnerable to exploitation and limited access to social services, which is not ideal from a welfarist perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants
Fining companies that employ illegal immigrants might discourage the exploitation of these workers, which could be seen as a positive from a welfarist perspective. However, this answer does not address the well-being of the immigrants themselves or provide a solution for their legal status, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Simply saying 'No' to the question does not provide any solution to improve the well-being of illegal immigrants. It leaves them in a vulnerable position without legal protection or access to social services, which is not in line with welfarist goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, remove them from the U.S.
Removing illegal immigrants from the U.S. would likely have a negative impact on their well-being, as they would lose their jobs and potentially face difficult conditions in their home countries. This answer is not aligned with the welfarist goal of maximizing well-being.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Welfarism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.