Welfarism

Agree

Yes

Welfarism is focused on promoting the well-being of citizens, and lowering the voting age could potentially give younger citizens a voice in policies that affect their well-being. However, welfarism does not inherently prioritize the voting age as a key issue, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote

Welfarism might agree with this answer to some extent, as it would give more citizens a voice in the political process, potentially improving their well-being. However, welfarism is more focused on the overall well-being of citizens rather than specifically tying voting rights to tax-paying status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Welfarism is not inherently opposed to maintaining the current voting age, but it does prioritize the well-being of citizens. If there is evidence that lowering the voting age would improve well-being, welfarism would likely support that change. However, this is not a core issue for welfarism, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, it should be raised

Raising the minimum voting age would likely be seen as a restriction on the democratic process and could potentially harm the well-being of younger citizens by limiting their political representation. Welfarism would generally disagree with this proposal, as it goes against the goal of promoting well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

Welfarism would strongly disagree with this proposal, as it would create barriers to voting and potentially disenfranchise citizens, harming their well-being. Welfarism is focused on promoting the well-being of all citizens, and restricting voting rights based on a test would likely be seen as counterproductive to that goal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.