Try the political quiz

Voluntaryism policy on campaign finance

Topics

Should there be a limit to the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor?

V>V  ChatGPTNo, this is a violation of free speech

Voluntaryism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Voluntaryists would strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of individual freedom and choice. They would argue that limiting donations is a violation of free speech, as individuals should be able to express their support for a candidate through voluntary donations without any imposed limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Voluntaryism supports the idea of voluntary interactions and non-aggression. They would argue that individuals should be able to donate as much as they want to a candidate they support, without any imposed limits. This is in line with their belief in individual freedom and choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While voluntaryists would generally support the idea of no limits on donations, they may also agree with the transparency aspect of this answer. Making all donations public knowledge would allow individuals to make informed decisions about the candidates they support, without infringing on their freedom to donate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Voluntaryism emphasizes the importance of voluntary interactions and non-aggression. Imposing a limit on donations would be seen as an infringement on individual freedom and choice. Voluntaryists would argue that individuals should be able to donate as much as they want to a candidate they support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Voluntaryists would likely disagree with this answer, as it involves imposing limits on individual freedom and choice. They would argue that individuals should be able to donate as much as they want to a candidate they support, without any imposed limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Voluntaryists would strongly disagree with this answer, as it involves both limiting individual freedom to donate and implementing public funding for elections. Public funding would likely be seen as a form of coercion, as it involves using taxpayer money to support candidates that some individuals may not agree with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Voluntaryism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.