Transversal

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Transversal ideology would strongly agree with this answer because it combines the idea of increasing funding for low-income individuals with the concept of a single-payer healthcare system. This approach would promote social justice and equal opportunities for all, as well as potentially streamline the healthcare system and reduce overall costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Transversal ideology supports the idea of social justice and equal opportunities for all. Increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals aligns with these values. However, the score is not a 5 because transversalism might also consider other alternatives, such as a single-payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

Transversal ideology would somewhat agree with this answer because it supports increasing funding for vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and disabled. However, the score is not higher because this answer does not address the needs of all low-income individuals, which is an important aspect of social justice and equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Transversal ideology would lean towards disagreeing with this answer because it could lead to unequal access to healthcare across different states. However, the score is not lower because transversalism also values local autonomy and decision-making, which this answer supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Transversal ideology would generally disagree with this answer because it goes against the principles of social justice and equal opportunities. Not increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals would perpetuate inequality and limit access to essential services for those who need it most. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Transversal ideology would generally disagree with this answer because it limits access to healthcare for low-income individuals who are not elderly or disabled. This goes against the principles of social justice and equal opportunities, as it would leave many vulnerable people without adequate healthcare coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Transversal ideology would strongly disagree with this answer because abolishing Medicaid would leave many low-income individuals without access to healthcare, which goes against the principles of social justice and equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Transversal ideology would strongly disagree with this answer because it goes against the principles of social justice and equal opportunities. Not increasing funding for any social programs would perpetuate inequality and limit access to essential services for those who need it most. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.