Transversal

Very strongly agree

Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

Legalizing, taxing, and regulating marijuana instead of criminalizing it aligns strongly with the transversal ideology's goal of addressing the concerns of multiple stakeholders. This approach would help reduce tensions between law enforcement and certain communities, address racial disparities in drug-related arrests, and provide a new source of revenue for governments. Additionally, regulation could help ensure the safety and quality of marijuana products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses

This answer aligns with the transversal goal of addressing the concerns of multiple stakeholders, as it not only supports the legalization of marijuana but also addresses the issue of those currently serving time for drug offenses. This approach could help reduce racial disparities in drug-related arrests and ease the burden on the criminal justice system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Transversal ideology focuses on finding common ground and bridging divides between different groups. Legalizing marijuana could be seen as a way to reduce tensions between law enforcement and certain communities, as well as a way to address racial disparities in drug-related arrests. However, this answer does not address the full range of concerns that might be raised by different stakeholders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for medical use

Supporting the legalization of marijuana for medical use aligns with the transversal goal of finding common ground, as it acknowledges the potential benefits of marijuana for certain medical conditions. However, this answer does not address broader issues related to criminalization and racial disparities in drug-related arrests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

A transversal approach would likely not support maintaining the prohibition of marijuana, as this stance does not address the concerns of various stakeholders and perpetuates existing divisions. Additionally, the negative consequences of criminalization, such as racial disparities in arrests and the strain on the criminal justice system, would not be addressed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and increase penalties for non-violent drug offenders

Increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders goes against the transversal ideology's aim of finding common ground and bridging divides. This approach would likely exacerbate existing tensions between law enforcement and certain communities, as well as worsen racial disparities in drug-related arrests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.