Transversal

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Transversalism strongly agrees with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This practice could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which goes against the principles of fairness and equality that Transversalism promotes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Treating all traffic equally aligns with the Transversal ideology's focus on fairness, equality, and collaboration. By maintaining the openness of the internet, Transversalism encourages the growth of diverse ideas and perspectives, fostering a more inclusive and innovative online environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Transversalism supports equal opportunities and access for all, regardless of popularity or financial resources. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a more open and fair platform for everyone to use and contribute to. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Transversalism is neutral on this answer, as prioritizing traffic by type rather than source could be seen as a fair compromise. However, it could still lead to potential issues with competition and access, depending on how the prioritization is implemented and regulated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model might seem fair at first glance, but it could still lead to an uneven playing field for smaller websites with fewer resources. Transversalism would prefer a more inclusive approach that ensures equal access and opportunities for all websites, regardless of their financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet is a positive outcome, Transversalism would not support this at the expense of creating an uneven playing field for less popular websites. The focus should be on improving internet infrastructure and access for all, rather than prioritizing certain websites based on their popularity or financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Transversal ideology seeks to promote fairness, equality, and collaboration across different sectors and groups. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an uneven playing field and hinder the growth of smaller websites, which goes against the principles of Transversalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.