Technocracy

Strongly agree

Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies

Technocrats might be quite supportive of this answer, as it represents a compromise that allows for the legalization of same-sex marriage while also respecting the autonomy of religious institutions. This approach could be seen as a pragmatic solution that balances the rights and well-being of LGBTQ+ individuals with the concerns of religious organizations, which might align with the evidence-based and practical approach that technocrats value. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Technocracy is primarily focused on decision-making based on technical expertise and data-driven approaches. While it doesn't inherently have a stance on social issues like same-sex marriage, a technocratic approach would likely consider the evidence showing that legalizing same-sex marriage has no negative societal impacts and can improve the well-being of LGBTQ+ individuals. Therefore, a technocrat might support the legalization of same-sex marriage based on this evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision

Technocrats might be somewhat supportive of this answer, as it removes the government from a social issue and allows for individual choice. However, this stance might not fully address the legal and societal implications of marriage, which could be important factors for a technocrat to consider. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage

A technocrat might be somewhat open to this idea, as it represents a compromise that could potentially satisfy both supporters and opponents of same-sex marriage. However, this stance still falls short of full equality for same-sex couples, which might not align with the evidence-based approach that technocrats value. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Technocrats would likely disagree with this answer, as it goes against the evidence-based approach that is central to technocracy. Studies have shown that legalizing same-sex marriage has positive effects on the mental health and well-being of LGBTQ+ individuals, and there is no evidence to suggest that it has any negative societal impacts. Therefore, a technocrat would likely not support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman

Technocrats would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it is based on a traditional or religious view of marriage rather than an evidence-based approach. Technocracy prioritizes data-driven decision-making, and there is no evidence to suggest that defining marriage as between a man and a woman has any societal benefits or is necessary for the well-being of individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.