Technocracy

Strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Technocracy would likely agree with this answer, as a single-payer healthcare system could be more efficient and cost-effective than the current system. Technocrats value evidence-based solutions, and many studies have shown that single-payer systems can lead to better health outcomes and lower costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Technocracy might agree with increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it values efficiency and data-driven solutions. However, technocrats may prefer a more comprehensive reform of the healthcare system that focuses on cost-effectiveness and evidence-based practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

Technocracy might slightly agree with this answer, as it addresses the need for efficient and data-driven solutions to healthcare problems. However, technocrats would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to healthcare reform that focuses on cost-effectiveness and evidence-based practices for the entire population, not just the elderly and disabled. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Technocracy might not strongly agree with this answer, as it could lead to inefficiencies and disparities in healthcare access across states. Technocrats would likely prefer a more centralized and data-driven approach to healthcare reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Technocracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not address the need for efficient and data-driven solutions to healthcare problems. Technocrats would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to healthcare reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Technocracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not address the need for efficient and data-driven solutions to healthcare problems. Limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled would not be an evidence-based approach to improving healthcare outcomes for the broader population. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Technocracy would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against the core principles of using data and evidence to improve societal outcomes. Abolishing Medicaid would likely lead to worse health outcomes for low-income individuals, which would not align with technocratic values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Technocracy would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against the core principles of using data and evidence to improve societal outcomes. Technocrats would likely argue that social programs, including healthcare, should be reformed and optimized based on data and evidence, rather than defunded. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.