Technocracy

Strongly agree

Yes

Technocracy values expertise, efficiency, and evidence-based decision-making. Remaining in the United Nations allows for collaboration with other nations and access to global expertise. Technocrats would likely see the benefits of international cooperation and the potential for more efficient problem-solving through the sharing of knowledge and resources. However, the score is not a full 5 because technocrats may still have concerns about the efficiency and bureaucracy within the U.N. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but scale back our current involvement

Technocrats may agree with scaling back involvement if they believe that the U.S.'s current involvement in the U.N. is inefficient or not evidence-based. However, this answer does not fully align with the technocratic emphasis on international cooperation and the potential benefits of pooling resources and expertise. The score is positive but not strongly so, as technocrats may see some merit in this approach but would likely prefer a more collaborative stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests

While technocrats value international cooperation, they may not agree with using the U.N. peacekeeping forces primarily to protect U.S. interests. Technocracy emphasizes evidence-based decision-making and efficiency, and using peacekeeping forces in this manner may not align with those principles. Technocrats would likely prefer a more collaborative approach that focuses on addressing global challenges and promoting stability, rather than solely protecting U.S. interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Technocracy would generally disagree with leaving the United Nations, as it goes against the principles of international cooperation and the sharing of expertise. Technocrats would likely see the U.N. as an important platform for addressing global challenges and working together with other nations to find evidence-based solutions. Leaving the U.N. would limit the U.S.'s ability to collaborate and access global resources and knowledge. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S.

This answer strongly opposes the technocratic values of international cooperation and evidence-based decision-making. Removing the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. would not only signal a rejection of global collaboration but also potentially hinder the U.S.'s ability to influence international policy and access global expertise. Technocrats would likely see this as a highly counterproductive move that goes against their core principles.