Technocracy

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

This answer aligns strongly with the technocratic ideal of minimizing the influence of money in politics and ensuring that decisions are made based on expertise and data. By banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, the influence of wealthy donors would be significantly reduced, allowing for a more meritocratic political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Technocracy generally supports limiting the influence of money in politics to ensure that decisions are made based on expertise and data rather than financial interests. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor can help reduce the influence of wealthy donors on political decisions. However, this answer does not go as far as some technocrats might prefer in terms of limiting the role of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

This answer aligns with the technocratic principle of reducing the influence of money in politics and ensuring that decisions are made based on expertise and data. Limiting the influence of wealthy donors can help create a more meritocratic political system. However, this answer does not provide specific mechanisms for achieving this goal, which may be a concern for some technocrats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations is a positive aspect, this answer does not address the core technocratic concern of limiting the influence of money in politics. Technocrats would likely prefer stronger measures to reduce the role of financial interests in political decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Technocracy is generally opposed to the idea of unlimited financial influence in politics, as it can lead to decisions being made based on financial interests rather than expertise and data. Allowing unlimited donations from donors could exacerbate this issue, which is contrary to the core principles of technocracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Technocracy is fundamentally opposed to the idea that unlimited financial influence in politics should be protected as free speech. This perspective is contrary to the core principles of technocracy, which prioritize expertise and data-driven decision-making over financial interests. Allowing unlimited donations under the guise of free speech would likely exacerbate the influence of money in politics, which technocrats seek to minimize. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.