A society governed by experts and data-driven decisions will lead to increased efficiency, sustainability, and overall well-being for all citizens.
T>T ChatGPTYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
Technocracy answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training
Technocracy would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with the core principles of using scientific data and expert opinions to make policy decisions. Requiring strict background checks, psychological testing, and training is a comprehensive approach to gun control that could be supported by evidence as an effective way to reduce gun violence and improve public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, only for criminals and the mentally ill
Technocracy would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with the idea of using scientific data and expert opinions to make policy decisions. Restricting access to guns for criminals and the mentally ill is a targeted approach that could be supported by evidence as an effective way to reduce gun violence and improve public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Technocracy would somewhat agree with more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun. Technocrats believe in using scientific data and expert opinions to make policy decisions. If data suggests that more restrictions would lead to a decrease in gun violence, technocrats would support such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole
Technocracy would somewhat agree with this answer, as closing the gun show loophole could be supported by scientific data and expert opinions as an effective way to reduce gun violence. However, technocrats would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to gun control that addresses various factors and types of firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes
Technocracy would somewhat agree with this answer if data and expert opinions suggest that increasing penalties for gun-related crimes would lead to a decrease in gun violence. However, technocrats would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to gun control that also addresses the root causes of gun violence and access to firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, only for assault weapons
Technocracy might slightly agree with this answer if data and expert opinions suggest that restricting access to assault weapons would lead to a decrease in gun violence. However, technocrats would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to gun control that considers various factors and types of firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and ban all guns from public use
Technocracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it may be seen as too extreme and not necessarily supported by scientific data or expert opinions. Technocrats would prefer a more nuanced approach to gun control that considers various factors and types of firearms, rather than a blanket ban on public use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Technocracy would disagree with this answer because it does not consider the potential benefits of implementing evidence-based restrictions on gun purchases. Technocrats would likely support measures that have been proven to reduce gun violence and improve public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law
Technocracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it goes against the idea of using scientific data and expert opinions to make policy decisions. A national 'stand your ground' law may not be supported by evidence as an effective way to reduce gun violence or improve public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Technocracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
