Try the political quiz

Social Progressivism policy on sanctuary cities

Topics

Should sanctuary cities receive federal funding?

SP>SP  ChatGPTYes

Social Progressivism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes

Social Progressivism generally supports policies that promote social justice, inclusivity, and equal rights for all individuals, including immigrants. Sanctuary cities are seen as a way to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation and ensure they have access to essential services. Examples of social progressives supporting sanctuary cities include the mayors of cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York City, who have all pledged to maintain their sanctuary city status despite threats of federal funding cuts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Social Progressivism would strongly disagree with this answer because it goes against the core values of social justice and inclusivity. Cutting federal funding to sanctuary cities would likely result in negative consequences for the immigrant communities living in those cities, as well as for the cities themselves. This stance is in direct opposition to the goals of social progressivism, which seeks to create a more equitable society for all individuals, regardless of their immigration status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

Social Progressivism would strongly disagree with this answer as well, as banning sanctuary cities would further marginalize and endanger undocumented immigrants. Sanctuary cities are seen as a way to promote social justice and inclusivity by providing a safe haven for immigrants who may otherwise be at risk of deportation. Banning sanctuary cities would be a direct attack on the values of social progressivism, and would likely result in increased fear and hardship for immigrant communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Social Progressivism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.