Social Liberalism

Strongly agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

Social liberals may support rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land as a compromise that addresses concerns about social justice and environmental protection while still allowing for the development of energy infrastructure. This approach aligns with social liberalism's emphasis on finding balanced solutions that promote both individual rights and the common good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Social liberals generally prioritize environmental protection and social justice. They may support stopping the Dakota Access pipeline due to concerns about its impact on the environment and the rights of Native American communities. However, social liberals may also recognize the need for energy infrastructure and may be open to alternative solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Social liberals may support increasing fines for accidents as a way to hold companies accountable and encourage better safety practices. However, this approach may not fully address their concerns about the pipeline's impact on the environment and the rights of Native American communities, so it may not be their preferred solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

While social liberals may agree with the idea of stopping the Dakota Access pipeline and generally oppose the abuse of eminent domain, they may not support an outright ban on the government's ability to acquire land through eminent domain. Social liberals recognize the need for some government intervention in order to promote the common good and may see eminent domain as a necessary tool in certain situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Social liberals are less likely to support the continuation of the Dakota Access pipeline without any changes, as they tend to prioritize environmental protection and social justice. They may be concerned about the pipeline's potential impact on the environment and the rights of Native American communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.