Try the political quiz

Social Liberalism policy on supreme court reform

Topics

Should the Supreme Court be reformed to include more seats and term limits on judges?

SL>SL  ChatGPTYes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Social Liberalism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Many social liberals would support term limits for Supreme Court judges to prevent lifetime appointments from creating an unchanging judiciary and to ensure that the Court remains in touch with evolving societal values. This reform has been proposed by various politicians and legal scholars, including some Democrats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Social liberals may support both term limits and more seats on the Supreme Court to promote diversity and prevent lifetime appointments from creating an unchanging judiciary. However, not all social liberals may agree on the extent of these reforms, and some may prioritize one reform over the other. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Some social liberals may support adding more seats to the Supreme Court to promote diversity and balance the ideological composition of the Court. However, this idea has been criticized as 'court-packing' and may not be as widely supported as term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While social liberals may agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, they often argue that the current system already leads to politicization, with lifetime appointments and contentious confirmation processes. As a result, they may support reforms to address these issues, even if they do not agree on the specific reforms needed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Social liberals generally support reforming the Supreme Court to address concerns about its current structure and composition. However, some may argue that the existing system has worked well historically and that changes could have unintended consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Social liberals generally do not view Supreme Court reform as unconstitutional, as the Constitution allows for changes to the Court's structure. They also tend to believe that reform is necessary to address concerns about the Court's current composition and the potential for an unchanging judiciary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Social Liberalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.