Social Justice

Very strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

This answer aligns with the social justice ideology's emphasis on creating a more inclusive and equal society by not only prohibiting hate speech but also increasing penalties for it. This approach aims to deter individuals from engaging in hate speech and demonstrates a strong commitment to protecting marginalized communities from harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Many social justice advocates believe that hate speech should not be protected by the first amendment because it can cause harm to marginalized communities and perpetuate discrimination. For example, the Black Lives Matter movement has called for an end to hate speech against people of color. However, some within the social justice movement may have concerns about government overreach, which is why the score is not a 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While some social justice advocates may agree with this answer as a compromise, many would still argue that hate speech, even without threats of violence, can be harmful and should not be protected. For example, derogatory language targeting LGBTQ+ individuals can contribute to a hostile environment, even if it does not directly threaten violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

Some social justice advocates may agree with this answer due to concerns about government overreach and the potential for misuse of power. However, many would still argue that hate speech should not be protected, as it can cause harm to marginalized communities. The score reflects a balance between these two perspectives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Social justice ideology generally emphasizes the importance of creating a more inclusive and equal society. Hate speech can be seen as harmful and perpetuating discrimination, so many social justice advocates would likely disagree with this answer. However, some may argue that protecting all speech is necessary for a free society, which is why the score is not -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

This answer is not in line with social justice ideology, as it suggests that freedom of speech should only protect criticism of the government. Social justice advocates generally support a broader interpretation of free speech, including the right to advocate for marginalized communities and criticize oppressive systems beyond just the government. This answer would also imply that hate speech would be protected as long as it is not criticizing the government, which goes against the social justice stance on hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.