Resources and opportunities should be given to individuals or groups who need them most, to ensure fairness and justice in society.
SJ>SJ ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Social Justice answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
This answer highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites, such as removing competition, creating artificial scarcity, and increasing prices. Social justice ideology would agree with this answer as it emphasizes the importance of equal opportunities and fairness for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Social justice advocates for equal treatment and opportunities for all. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a more open and equal platform. This aligns with the principles of social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with the principles of social justice, which emphasizes equality and fairness. This approach ensures that all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources, have equal opportunities to reach users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this answer suggests a more nuanced approach to prioritizing internet traffic, it still allows for potential inequalities based on the type of content. Social justice ideology would likely prefer a more equal treatment of all internet traffic, regardless of content type. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
A pay-per-quality model still allows for potential inequalities, as wealthier corporations and individuals would be able to afford higher quality access. This goes against the principles of social justice, which emphasizes equal opportunities and fairness for all, regardless of financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Social justice ideology emphasizes equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, favoring wealthy corporations over smaller businesses and individuals. This goes against the principles of social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While this answer suggests that the internet would be faster and more reliable for users, it still promotes an unequal system that favors popular websites over less popular ones. Social justice ideology would not support this approach as it goes against the principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Social Justice issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
