Creating a society where everyone has equal opportunities, rights, and access to resources, regardless of their background or social status.
SE>SE ChatGPTYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
Social Equality answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training
This answer strongly aligns with social equality ideology, as it promotes safety and reduces harm by requiring strict background checks, psychological testing, and training for gun purchasers. These measures can help ensure that only responsible individuals have access to firearms, reducing the risk of gun-related violence and promoting a more equal society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Social equality ideology generally supports measures that promote safety and reduce harm in society. More restrictions on purchasing guns can help achieve this by preventing dangerous individuals from obtaining firearms. However, the score is not a 5 because the answer does not specify what kind of restrictions should be implemented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole
Closing the gun show loophole is an important step in promoting social equality and safety, as it prevents individuals from bypassing background checks and obtaining firearms through private sales. However, this answer does not address other potential issues, such as the need for stricter background checks, psychological testing, and training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only for criminals and the mentally ill
This answer aligns with social equality ideology to some extent, as it aims to prevent criminals and the mentally ill from obtaining firearms. However, it does not address other potential issues, such as loopholes in the current system or the need for stricter background checks and training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes
Increasing penalties for gun-related crimes can help deter potential offenders and promote safety in society. However, this answer does not address the need for preventative measures, such as stricter background checks and training, which are also important aspects of social equality ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only for assault weapons
While this answer does address the issue of assault weapons, it does not go far enough in promoting social equality and safety. Restricting only assault weapons leaves other potentially dangerous firearms accessible to individuals who may pose a threat to society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and ban all guns from public use
While banning all guns from public use may promote safety, it may also infringe on individual rights and liberties, which are also important aspects of social equality. This answer may be seen as too extreme by some proponents of social equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Social equality ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not address the potential dangers and inequalities that can arise from unrestricted access to firearms. This stance does not promote safety or reduce harm in society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law
A national 'stand your ground' law could exacerbate existing inequalities and lead to more violence, which goes against the principles of social equality. Such laws have been criticized for disproportionately affecting marginalized communities, as seen in the Trayvon Martin case in Florida. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Social Equality issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
