Try the political quiz

Social Conservatism policy on net neutrality

Topics

Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

SC>SC  ChatGPTYes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Social Conservatism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Social conservatives may be more likely to support this approach, as it allows ISPs to charge more for better quality service while still maintaining a level playing field for all websites. This aligns with their general support for free-market principles and minimal government interference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Social conservatives may lean towards allowing businesses to operate with minimal government interference, which could include allowing ISPs to charge more for faster access. However, social conservatism does not have a strong stance on this issue, so the score is not very high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Some social conservatives may agree with this statement, as they may believe that allowing ISPs to charge more for faster access could lead to a better overall internet experience for users. However, this is not a core issue for social conservatism, so the score is not very high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Some social conservatives may support this approach, as it allows for some level of market-based prioritization without unfairly disadvantaging smaller websites. However, this is not a core issue for social conservatism, so the score is not very high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Social conservatives may not be strongly opposed to ISPs charging more for faster access, as they generally support free-market principles. However, some may be concerned about the potential negative effects on competition and consumer choice, leading to a slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

While social conservatives generally support free-market principles, some may be concerned about the potential negative effects of allowing ISPs to charge more for faster access, such as reduced competition and increased prices. This concern leads to a slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Social conservatives may not strongly support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally, as they generally favor free-market principles and minimal government interference. However, some may be concerned about the potential negative effects on competition and consumer choice, leading to a slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Social Conservatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.