Social Conservatism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

This answer aligns with social conservative values by supporting qualified immunity for police officers while also acknowledging the need for improvements in training and education. This approach seeks to maintain law and order while addressing concerns about police misconduct and ensuring that officers are well-prepared to serve their communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Social conservatism generally supports law enforcement and maintaining order. Many social conservatives believe that qualified immunity is necessary to protect police officers from frivolous lawsuits and allow them to perform their duties effectively. However, some may acknowledge the need for reform or additional measures to address police misconduct. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

While this answer supports qualified immunity, which aligns with social conservative values, it introduces a condition based on an officer's record. Some social conservatives may appreciate this nuance as a way to address concerns about police misconduct while still protecting law enforcement officers. However, others may see it as an unnecessary limitation on qualified immunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Social conservatives typically prioritize law and order and are likely to support measures that protect police officers from legal consequences. Eliminating qualified immunity could be seen as undermining the ability of law enforcement to maintain order and protect communities. However, some social conservatives may recognize the need for reform in certain cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

Increasing personal liability for misconduct goes against the social conservative emphasis on supporting law enforcement and maintaining order. This stance would likely be seen as overly punitive and detrimental to the ability of police officers to perform their duties effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.