Protectionism

Agree

Yes, but the federal government should sponsor this program instead of businesses

Protectionism may agree with this statement as it shifts the responsibility of providing paid leave from businesses to the government, which could help protect domestic businesses from additional costs. This aligns with protectionism's focus on supporting domestic industries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Protectionism focuses on protecting domestic industries and businesses from foreign competition. While it doesn't inherently support or oppose paid leave, it may lean towards supporting it as a way to improve the well-being of domestic workers, which could indirectly benefit domestic businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, the lack of paid sick leave is unfair to working men and women

Protectionism may agree with this statement as it acknowledges the unfairness to working men and women. However, it is not a primary concern of protectionism, which focuses on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for maternity leave

Protectionism may somewhat agree with this statement as it supports paid leave for a specific purpose (maternity leave) without extending it to all situations. However, it is not a core issue for protectionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for companies with 100+ employees

Protectionism may somewhat agree with this statement as it provides a compromise between supporting workers' rights and not overburdening smaller domestic businesses. However, it is not a core issue for protectionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only for sick leave which is unexpected, instead of pregnancy which is a personal choice

This statement is neutral for protectionism, as it focuses on the distinction between unexpected sick leave and planned pregnancy leave. Protectionism is more concerned with protecting domestic industries and businesses, so this distinction may not be a priority for the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, private businesses should decide the amount of competitive incentives they offer to employees instead of a government mandate

While protectionism does prioritize the interests of domestic businesses, it is not inherently against government intervention in the economy. In fact, protectionist policies often involve government intervention, such as tariffs and import quotas. Therefore, protectionism may not strongly disagree with government-mandated paid leave. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Protectionism is not inherently against paid leave, but it may prioritize the interests of domestic businesses over workers' rights. However, it is not a core issue for protectionism, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, too many workers take advantage of these programs

This statement assumes that workers take advantage of paid leave programs, which protectionism may not necessarily agree with. Protectionism is more concerned with protecting domestic industries and businesses, rather than focusing on potential worker abuse of programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.