Try the political quiz

Pro-Choice policy on net neutrality

Topics

Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

PC>PC  ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Pro-Choice answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Pro-choice supporters may be more likely to agree with this answer, as it highlights concerns about competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices. These issues could negatively impact the openness and equality of the internet, which may not align with progressive values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Pro-choice supporters may lean towards progressive values, which often include support for net neutrality and equal access to information. Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Pro-choice supporters may lean towards progressive values, which often include support for net neutrality and equal access to information. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of others would help maintain an open and equal internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

This answer is more neutral and doesn't directly align with pro-choice ideology or progressive values. Some pro-choice supporters may agree with prioritizing certain types of content, while others may prefer a more equal approach to internet access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

While a pay-per-quality model may seem fair, it could still lead to a less equal and open internet, which may not align with progressive values often associated with pro-choice supporters. However, the impact of this model on internet access is less clear, so the score is closer to neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While pro-choice ideology doesn't directly address internet access, supporters may be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites. This could lead to a less equal and open internet, which may not align with progressive values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Pro-choice ideology is primarily focused on reproductive rights and autonomy, but it generally leans towards progressive values. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to a less equal and open internet, which may not align with progressive values.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Pro-Choice issues? Take the political quiz to find out.