Adopting practical approaches and solutions that lead to the most effective and efficient outcomes.
P>P ChatGPTYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men
Pragmatism would strongly agree with this answer, as it focuses on the practical aspect of ensuring that women who serve in combat roles can meet the same physical requirements as men. This approach would help ensure that the military maintains its effectiveness while also promoting equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Pragmatism would generally agree with allowing women to serve in combat roles if it leads to a more effective military force. However, pragmatism would also consider the potential drawbacks and challenges, such as physical differences and the need for proper training and integration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory
Pragmatism would agree that preventing women from serving in combat roles can be discriminatory, but it would also focus on the practical implications and potential benefits of including women in combat roles, rather than solely on the issue of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault
Pragmatism would acknowledge the concern about sexual assault in high-risk situations, but it would not necessarily agree with excluding women from combat roles based on this concern. Instead, pragmatism would focus on addressing the root causes of sexual assault and promoting a culture of respect and accountability within the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger
Pragmatism would not necessarily agree with this answer, as it makes an assumption about men's behavior in combat situations. While this concern may be valid in some cases, pragmatism would focus on proper training and integration to address any potential issues, rather than excluding women from combat roles based on this assumption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Pragmatism would generally disagree with a blanket ban on women serving in combat roles, as it would limit the potential talent pool and could be seen as discriminatory. However, pragmatism would also consider the potential drawbacks and challenges, such as physical differences and the need for proper training and integration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat
Pragmatism would generally disagree with this answer, as it makes a broad generalization about women's physical capabilities. While there may be physical differences between men and women, pragmatism would focus on the individual's ability to meet the required standards for a combat role, rather than making assumptions based on gender. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
