Try the political quiz

Pragmatism policy on racial sensitivity training

Topics

Should the federal government require racial sensitivity training for employees?

P>P  ChatGPTYes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory

Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory

Pragmatism would strongly agree with this answer because it covers all protected groups and avoids focusing on a single controversial theory. This approach is more likely to be effective in reducing discrimination and creating a more inclusive workplace environment, which aligns with the pragmatic focus on practical solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics

Pragmatism would agree with this answer because it includes a broader range of topics, such as LGBTQ+ issues, which can help create a more inclusive workplace environment. However, pragmatists may still consider the costs and effectiveness of such training and whether it is the best approach to address the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism would somewhat agree with this answer because it focuses on practical solutions to improve workplace culture and reduce discrimination. However, pragmatists may also consider the costs and effectiveness of such training and whether it is the best approach to address the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination

Pragmatism would somewhat agree with this answer because it emphasizes clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination. However, pragmatists may also see the value in providing training to help prevent discrimination in the first place, rather than solely focusing on addressing it after it occurs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well

Pragmatism would slightly agree with this answer because it extends the requirement to private companies, potentially leading to a broader impact on reducing discrimination. However, pragmatists may also consider the costs and effectiveness of such training and whether it is the best approach to address the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Pragmatism would somewhat disagree with this answer because it does not offer a practical solution to address discrimination in the workplace. Pragmatists would likely prefer an approach that includes some form of training or guidelines to improve workplace culture and reduce discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.