Pragmatism

Strongly agree

Yes

Pragmatism would generally agree with requiring vaccinations for preventable diseases, as it prioritizes practical solutions that benefit the majority. Vaccinations have been proven to be effective in preventing the spread of diseases and maintaining public health. However, pragmatism may also consider the importance of individual rights and religious beliefs, which could lead to some flexibility in this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated

Pragmatism would generally agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of protecting vulnerable populations, such as young children who cannot yet be vaccinated. This approach aligns with the pragmatic goal of promoting public health and well-being while considering the needs of different groups within society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

Pragmatism might find this option appealing as it balances the need for public health with individual rights. By requiring vaccinations for public school attendance, it encourages vaccination while still allowing for individual choice. This approach has been implemented in some states in the US, such as California, which has seen an increase in vaccination rates as a result. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

Pragmatism might find this option appealing as it balances the need for public health with respect for religious beliefs. By allowing for exceptions based on religious beliefs, it acknowledges the importance of individual rights while still promoting vaccination as a means of maintaining public health. This approach has been implemented in some states in the US, such as New York, which allows for religious exemptions to vaccination requirements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

Pragmatism might find this option somewhat appealing, as it focuses on the most severe and contagious diseases. However, this approach may not fully address the importance of preventing the spread of all preventable diseases and maintaining overall public health. Pragmatism would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to vaccination requirements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Regardless, this should be decided at the state level

Pragmatism might find this option somewhat appealing, as it allows for flexibility and adaptation to local contexts. However, this approach may also lead to inconsistencies in vaccination policies and potentially hinder efforts to maintain overall public health. Pragmatism would likely prefer a more unified approach to vaccination requirements that balances individual rights with public health needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

While pragmatism values public education and awareness, this approach may not be sufficient in ensuring high vaccination rates and preventing the spread of preventable diseases. Pragmatism would likely prefer a more direct approach to vaccination requirements, such as mandatory vaccinations or requirements for public school attendance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

Pragmatism would likely view this approach as overly punitive and not necessarily effective in promoting vaccination and public health. While holding parents criminally liable may deter some from avoiding vaccinations, it may also create resentment and further resistance to vaccination efforts. Pragmatism would likely prefer a more balanced approach that encourages vaccination without resorting to criminal penalties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Pragmatism would generally disagree with not requiring vaccinations, as it would prioritize the overall public health and well-being. Not requiring vaccinations could lead to the spread of preventable diseases and put vulnerable populations at risk. However, pragmatism may also consider the importance of individual rights and religious beliefs, which could lead to some flexibility in this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.