Pragmatism

Strongly agree

Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record

Pragmatism would likely agree with this answer because it provides a practical solution for addressing the issue of illegal immigration while recognizing the value of immigrants who contribute to the economy and have no criminal record. This approach has been used in the past, such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which granted amnesty to millions of undocumented immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism would somewhat agree with this answer because it acknowledges the reality that many illegal immigrants are already working and contributing to the economy. However, pragmatism would also consider the potential drawbacks of temporary amnesty, such as encouraging more illegal immigration or the potential for exploitation of workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if they pay taxes

Pragmatism would somewhat agree with this answer because it provides a practical solution that recognizes the contributions of working illegal immigrants while also ensuring that they pay their fair share in taxes. However, pragmatism would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach that addresses the root causes of illegal immigration and provides a clear path to legal status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but allow them to stay

Pragmatism might somewhat agree with this answer because it recognizes the value of keeping working illegal immigrants in the country, but it does not provide a clear solution for their legal status. Pragmatism would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach that addresses the root causes of illegal immigration and provides a path to legal status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants

Pragmatism might slightly agree with this answer because it addresses the issue of employers exploiting illegal immigrants and potentially driving down wages for all workers. However, pragmatism would also recognize that this approach alone may not be sufficient to address the broader issue of illegal immigration and may have unintended consequences, such as pushing illegal immigrants further into the shadows. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, remove them from the U.S.

Pragmatism would likely disagree with this answer because it does not take into account the economic contributions of working illegal immigrants and the potential negative consequences of mass deportations, such as labor shortages and the cost of enforcement. Pragmatism would likely prefer a more nuanced approach that balances the needs of the economy with the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Pragmatism would likely disagree with this answer because it does not provide any solution to the issue of illegal immigration and the presence of working illegal immigrants in the country. Pragmatism would prefer an approach that addresses the problem in a practical and effective manner. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.