Pragmatism

Strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

This answer aligns well with pragmatism, as it emphasizes the need for a higher quality of care and services in the mental healthcare system. Pragmatists would likely support this approach, as it focuses on practical improvements and outcomes for individuals and society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism is focused on practical solutions and outcomes. Increasing funding for mental health research and treatment could lead to better outcomes for individuals and society as a whole. However, pragmatists may also consider other factors, such as the effectiveness of current funding and potential alternative solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

Pragmatists may support the idea of increasing funding for personalized care, as it could lead to better outcomes for individuals with mental health issues. However, they would also likely consider the broader implications of this approach, such as the potential for increased costs and the need to balance funding for various aspects of mental healthcare, including research and pharmaceutical development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

Pragmatists may be open to the idea of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues, as they are focused on finding practical solutions. However, they would likely want to carefully consider the potential consequences and effectiveness of this approach compared to other options, such as direct government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Pragmatists would likely disagree with this answer because they recognize the importance of mental health in society and the potential benefits of increased funding. However, they may also consider alternative solutions and weigh the costs and benefits of government funding versus other approaches. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.