Pragmatism

Strongly agree

No, but shorten the lifespan of drug patents

Pragmatism would strongly agree with the idea of shortening the lifespan of drug patents. This approach balances the need for innovation and investment in research and development with the goal of making life-saving drugs more accessible and affordable for the public. By shortening patent lifespans, competition can drive down prices while still allowing companies to profit from their innovations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism would moderately agree with regulating the prices of life-saving drugs. Pragmatists focus on practical solutions and outcomes. Regulating prices could ensure that more people have access to essential medications, improving public health. However, pragmatists would also consider the potential negative impacts on innovation and the pharmaceutical industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the government should regulate the price of all prescription drugs

Pragmatism would somewhat agree with the idea that the government should regulate the price of all prescription drugs. Pragmatists recognize the importance of ensuring access to essential medications for the public, but they would also consider the potential negative impacts on innovation and the pharmaceutical industry. They would likely advocate for a balanced approach that considers both public health and industry concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs

Pragmatism would slightly agree with the argument that limiting drug prices could limit investment in research and development. Pragmatists understand the importance of innovation and the role of market forces in driving progress. However, they would also consider the potential negative consequences of high drug prices on public health and access to essential medications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, and we should socialize medicine and healthcare

Pragmatism would neither agree nor disagree with the idea of socializing medicine and healthcare. Pragmatists focus on practical solutions and outcomes, and the effectiveness of socialized medicine would depend on the specific context and implementation. They would likely consider both the potential benefits and drawbacks of socialized medicine before making a decision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Pragmatism would slightly disagree with not regulating the prices of life-saving drugs. While pragmatists recognize the importance of market forces and innovation, they also understand the need for government intervention in certain cases, such as ensuring access to essential medications for the public. However, they would not completely dismiss the potential benefits of market-driven pricing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the government should never regulate prices of private businesses

Pragmatism would strongly disagree with the idea that the government should never regulate prices of private businesses. Pragmatists believe in practical solutions and recognize that there are situations where government intervention is necessary to protect public interests, such as in the case of monopolies or public health crises. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.