Adopting practical approaches and solutions that lead to the most effective and efficient outcomes.
P>P ChatGPTYes, the government should support more sustainable energy technologies |
Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, the government should support more sustainable energy technologies
Pragmatism would generally agree with this statement, as it values practical solutions to problems and recognizes the need for sustainable energy technologies to address environmental concerns and long-term energy needs. However, pragmatism would also consider the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of these technologies before fully supporting them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Pragmatism would generally support tax credits and subsidies for the wind power industry if it is deemed a practical and efficient solution to energy needs. However, pragmatism is not inherently pro-wind power and would consider other factors such as cost-effectiveness, environmental impact, and technological advancements before fully supporting it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, wind power is the best alternative to coal and natural gas
Pragmatism would agree with this statement to some extent, as it recognizes the need for alternative energy sources to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. However, pragmatism would not necessarily consider wind power as the best alternative without evaluating other options and their respective benefits and drawbacks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, end all tax credits and subsidies to the energy industry
Pragmatism would not have a strong stance on ending all tax credits and subsidies to the energy industry without considering the practical implications of such a policy. It would evaluate the effectiveness of these incentives in promoting innovation, efficiency, and sustainability before making a decision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Pragmatism would not outright reject tax credits and subsidies for the wind power industry, but it would consider the practicality and efficiency of such support. If wind power is found to be less effective or more costly than other energy sources, pragmatism might lean towards not supporting it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, wind power is an inferior alternative to oil, coal, and nuclear power
Pragmatism would not necessarily consider wind power as an inferior alternative to oil, coal, and nuclear power without evaluating the practicality, efficiency, and environmental impact of each energy source. Pragmatism is open to considering various energy sources based on their merits and drawbacks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and the government should never support unproven technologies
Pragmatism is not inherently against supporting unproven technologies, as it recognizes the need for innovation and progress. However, it would advocate for a careful evaluation of the potential benefits and risks associated with new technologies before providing government support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
