Pragmatism

Agree

Yes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote

Pragmatism might support the idea that any citizen who pays taxes should be allowed to vote, as it is a practical and outcome-oriented approach. This idea is based on the principle of 'no taxation without representation,' which has historical roots in the American Revolution. However, pragmatists would still want to consider the potential consequences and benefits of such a change before fully endorsing it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism might be open to the idea of lowering the minimum voting age if there is evidence that younger voters are capable of making informed decisions and if it leads to increased civic engagement. However, pragmatists would likely want to see more data and research on the potential benefits and drawbacks before making a decision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Pragmatism does not inherently support or oppose the current minimum voting age. Instead, pragmatists would evaluate the effectiveness of the current system and consider potential changes based on evidence and practical outcomes. If the current voting age is found to be effective, pragmatists would likely support maintaining it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, it should be raised

Pragmatism would likely disagree with raising the minimum voting age without strong evidence that doing so would lead to better outcomes. Raising the voting age could potentially disenfranchise younger citizens and reduce civic engagement, which pragmatists would likely view as undesirable unless there is a compelling reason to do so. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

Pragmatism would likely disagree with the idea of requiring voters to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This approach could potentially disenfranchise many citizens and create barriers to voting, which pragmatists would view as undesirable. Additionally, there is historical evidence of literacy tests being used to discriminate against minority voters in the United States, which pragmatists would likely consider when evaluating this proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.