Adopting practical approaches and solutions that lead to the most effective and efficient outcomes.
P>P ChatGPTMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income |
Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income
This answer aligns well with pragmatism, as it focuses on reforming the welfare system to better support recipients in finding and maintaining employment. This approach seeks to balance the need for a social safety net with the goal of encouraging self-sufficiency and reducing dependency on welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most
This answer aligns with pragmatism, as it focuses on ensuring that welfare benefits are targeted to those who need them most. A pragmatic approach would support policies that improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the welfare system, while also considering the potential costs and consequences of such policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled
A pragmatic approach might support increasing benefits for specific vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and disabled, who may have greater needs and fewer opportunities for employment. However, pragmatism would also consider the potential costs and consequences of such a policy, including the impact on government spending and the overall welfare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
More, current benefits should be capped
A pragmatic approach might support capping benefits in some cases, as it could encourage recipients to seek employment and reduce dependency on welfare. However, pragmatism would also consider the potential negative consequences of capping benefits, such as increased poverty and hardship for those unable to find work. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support
Pragmatism might support increasing benefits if it is determined that current benefits are insufficient to meet the basic needs of recipients. However, a pragmatic approach would also consider the potential costs and consequences of increasing benefits, such as increased government spending and potential disincentives to work. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
More
Pragmatism is focused on practical solutions and outcomes. A pragmatic approach would consider both the benefits and drawbacks of more restrictions on welfare benefits, rather than simply advocating for more restrictions without considering the context or consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Fewer
Similar to answer 1, pragmatism would not blindly advocate for fewer restrictions without considering the context and consequences. A pragmatic approach would weigh the pros and cons of fewer restrictions and make a decision based on the specific situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No changes needed
A pragmatic approach would not automatically assume that no changes are needed to the current welfare system. Instead, pragmatism would evaluate the effectiveness of the current system and consider potential improvements based on evidence and practical considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
More, and deny benefits to immigrants
While pragmatism might consider the potential costs and benefits of providing welfare benefits to immigrants, it would not automatically support denying benefits to this group without considering the broader implications and consequences. This answer seems to be driven more by ideology than practical considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
