Pragmatism

Very strongly agree

No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods

This answer aligns strongly with pragmatism, as it focuses on practical solutions and consequences. Increasing surveillance and patrol of high crime neighborhoods is an effective approach that targets areas with higher crime rates and avoids potential negative consequences of racial or religious profiling. This approach is more likely to yield positive results and improve overall safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion

This answer aligns well with pragmatism, as it focuses on practical solutions and consequences. Basing the decision on crime rates instead of race or religion is a more objective and effective approach, as it targets areas with higher crime rates and avoids potential negative consequences of racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary

Pragmatism is concerned with practical consequences and solutions. While targeting Muslims may be unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary, a pragmatist would also consider the potential negative consequences of such actions, such as increased resentment and marginalization, which could lead to further problems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

A pragmatist might not completely disagree with this answer, but they would likely want more information on the specific circumstances and potential consequences before making a decision. They would consider the practical implications of not increasing surveillance and patrol in Muslim neighborhoods. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease

A pragmatist might see some merit in this answer, as it suggests a temporary increase in surveillance until a specific problem is resolved. However, they would also consider the potential negative consequences of targeting a specific religious group and whether this approach would be the most effective solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants

While a pragmatist might see some merit in increasing surveillance on new immigrants, they would also consider the potential negative consequences of such actions, such as increased resentment and marginalization. A more pragmatic approach would be to focus on high crime areas or specific threats, rather than targeting a specific group of people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Pragmatism focuses on practical solutions and consequences. Increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods may not be the most effective solution, as it could lead to further marginalization and resentment. A more pragmatic approach would be to focus on high crime areas or specific threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.