Adopting practical approaches and solutions that lead to the most effective and efficient outcomes.
P>P ChatGPTNo, only for criminals and the mentally ill |
Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, only for criminals and the mentally ill
Pragmatism would likely agree with restrictions only for criminals and the mentally ill, as it seeks practical solutions that balance individual rights with public safety. This approach targets those most likely to misuse firearms while respecting the rights of law-abiding citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole
Pragmatism would agree with closing the gun show loophole, as it seeks practical solutions to address gun violence. This approach balances individual rights with public safety by ensuring that all gun purchasers undergo background checks, regardless of where they buy their firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training
Pragmatism would agree with requiring strict background checks, psychological testing, and training, as it seeks practical solutions to address gun violence. This approach balances individual rights with public safety by ensuring responsible gun ownership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Pragmatism would somewhat agree with more restrictions on purchasing a gun, as it seeks practical solutions to problems. However, pragmatism would also consider the effectiveness of such restrictions and the potential unintended consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes
Pragmatism would somewhat agree with increasing penalties for gun-related crimes, as it seeks practical solutions to address gun violence. However, it would also consider the effectiveness of such penalties and the potential for unintended consequences, such as over-incarceration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, only for assault weapons
Pragmatism might slightly agree with restrictions only for assault weapons, as it seeks to balance individual rights with public safety. However, it would also consider the effectiveness of such restrictions and the potential for unintended consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Pragmatism would somewhat disagree with no additional restrictions, as it recognizes the need for practical solutions to address gun violence. However, it would also consider the importance of individual rights and the potential negative effects of over-regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law
Pragmatism would likely disagree with a national 'stand your ground' law, as it would prioritize finding a balance between individual rights and public safety. A 'stand your ground' law could potentially escalate conflicts and lead to more violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all guns from public use
Pragmatism would likely disagree with banning all guns from public use, as it seeks to balance individual rights with public safety. A complete ban would infringe on individual rights and could potentially lead to unintended consequences, such as a black market for firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
