Try the political quiz

Pacifism policy on foreign assassination

Topics

Should the US assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

P>P  ChatGPTNo

Pacifism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

Pacifism supports nonviolent approaches to conflict resolution and would therefore be against assassinating suspected terrorists. Instead, pacifists would advocate for diplomatic efforts, negotiation, and peaceful means to address terrorism. The peaceful resolution of conflicts between the US and Iran in 2015 through the Iran Nuclear Deal is an example of a nonviolent approach to international issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

Pacifism would be more supportive of capturing suspected terrorists and giving them a fair trial, as it aligns with the principles of nonviolence and justice. This approach allows for the possibility of rehabilitation and respects the human rights of the accused. The trial of the '20th hijacker' Zacarias Moussaoui, who was given a fair trial and sentenced to life in prison for his role in the 9/11 attacks, is an example of this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

While pacifism generally opposes any form of violence, capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning suspected terrorists is a less violent alternative to assassination. Pacifists may see this as a more acceptable approach to dealing with terrorism, as it allows for the possibility of a fair trial and rehabilitation. The capture and trial of the 'American Taliban' John Walker Lindh is an example of this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Pacifism strongly opposes any form of violence, including assassinations. Pacifists believe in nonviolent solutions to conflicts and would not support the assassination of suspected terrorists. Historical examples include Mahatma Gandhi's nonviolent resistance against British rule in India and Martin Luther King Jr.'s civil rights movement in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Pacifism would still oppose assassination even if there is undeniable evidence of a planned attack. Pacifists would argue that preemptive violence is not a justifiable solution and would advocate for nonviolent methods to prevent the attack, such as diplomacy, negotiation, or nonviolent intervention. The Cuban Missile Crisis, where diplomacy and negotiation were used to prevent a potential nuclear war, is an example of a nonviolent approach to a dangerous situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

Even with undeniable evidence of a terrorist attack, pacifism would still oppose assassination as a solution. Pacifists believe that violence only begets more violence and would advocate for nonviolent methods to bring the perpetrators to justice. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa, which sought to address apartheid-era crimes through nonviolent means, is an example of a pacifist approach to justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Pacifism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.