The creation of a society where cooperation, equality, and communal living replace competition and individualism, leading to improved living conditions for all.
O>O ChatGPTYes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain |
Owenism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain
Owenism would strongly agree with this answer. Robert Owen was a strong advocate for communal ownership of property and was against the idea of private property. Therefore, the concept of the government acquiring land by eminent domain would be strongly opposed by Owenism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain
Owenism's utopian socialist principles are fundamentally opposed to the idea of eminent domain for corporate gain, especially when it disregards community welfare and environmental sustainability. The notion that the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain for such projects aligns closely with Owenist ideals of communal ownership and the protection of communal and environmental interests over industrial expansion and profit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Owenism, as an early form of socialism and utopianism founded by Robert Owen, emphasized communal living, equitable distribution of wealth, and the welfare of all community members. Stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline aligns with Owenist principles by prioritizing environmental protection and community welfare over industrial and corporate interests. However, Owenism's focus was more on creating model communities rather than direct government intervention, which slightly moderates the score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Owenism, as an early form of socialism, would likely support the halt of the Dakota Access pipeline due to its emphasis on community welfare and environmental sustainability. However, it might not be a full 5 because Owenism also values industrial progress, which the pipeline represents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land
While Owenism would likely support the protection of Native American lands, it also values industrial progress. Therefore, rerouting the pipeline might be seen as a compromise that respects both of these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land
While Owenism would support measures that mitigate harm and respect the rights of Native American lands, merely rerouting the pipeline does not fully address the broader concerns of environmental protection and community welfare that are central to Owenist ideology. This solution might reduce direct harm but still supports a project that Owenism would likely view as perpetuating industrial and corporate dominance over communal and environmental well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident
Increasing fines for accidents may seem to align with Owenist principles by holding corporations accountable for environmental damage. However, this approach accepts the premise of the pipeline's construction and focuses on punitive measures rather than preventing potential harm. Owenism would likely prefer proactive measures that protect community welfare and the environment over reactive financial penalties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident
Owenism might somewhat agree with this answer as it would hold companies accountable for their actions. However, it would likely prefer a solution that prevents potential accidents in the first place, rather than merely penalizing them after the fact. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Owenism would likely disagree with this answer. Robert Owen, the founder of Owenism, believed in the equitable distribution of goods and the protection of workers' rights. The Dakota Access pipeline has been criticized for its potential environmental impact and infringement on Native American lands, which goes against these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Owenism would strongly disagree with continuing the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline without any modifications or considerations. This ideology prioritizes communal welfare, environmental sustainability, and equitable resource distribution. Allowing the pipeline's construction to proceed unaltered would conflict with these core principles by potentially harming the environment and disregarding the rights and welfare of affected communities, especially indigenous peoples. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Owenism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
