Try the political quiz

Non-Interventionism policy on marijuana

Topics

Do you support the legalization of Marijuana?

NI>NI  ChatGPTYes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses

Non-Interventionism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses

This answer aligns strongly with non-interventionist principles, as it not only supports the legalization of marijuana but also addresses the issue of those currently serving time for drug offenses. This approach emphasizes individual liberties and reducing government interference in personal choices, while also addressing the consequences of past government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Non-interventionism generally supports individual liberties and minimal government interference in personal choices. Legalizing marijuana aligns with this ideology, as it allows individuals to make their own decisions regarding its use. However, non-interventionism does not specifically focus on drug policy, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

While this answer supports the legalization of marijuana, which aligns with non-interventionist principles, it also involves government regulation and taxation. Non-interventionists may agree with the legalization aspect but may not fully support the additional government involvement in regulating and taxing marijuana. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for medical use

While non-interventionism supports individual liberties, legalizing marijuana only for medical use still involves some level of government regulation and control. This answer is not entirely against non-interventionist principles, but it does not fully align with the ideology's preference for minimal government interference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Non-interventionism generally opposes government interference in personal choices, and keeping marijuana illegal goes against this principle. Prohibition of marijuana represents a significant level of government control over individual liberties, which non-interventionists would likely disagree with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and increase penalties for non-violent drug offenders

Increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders is in direct opposition to non-interventionist principles. This approach represents a significant increase in government control and interference in personal choices, which non-interventionists would strongly disagree with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Non-Interventionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.