Non-Interventionism

Agree

No, only for criminals and the mentally ill

Non-interventionists may support restrictions on gun purchases for criminals and the mentally ill, as these restrictions can be seen as reasonable measures to protect public safety without overly infringing on individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Non-interventionists may support fewer restrictions on gun purchases due to their preference for limited government intervention. However, this stance is not absolute, and some non-interventionists may still support certain restrictions for public safety reasons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes

Non-interventionists may support increasing penalties for gun-related crimes as a means of addressing gun violence without directly restricting gun ownership. However, this stance may vary among non-interventionists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

While non-interventionists generally prefer limited government intervention, they may not necessarily support a national 'stand your ground' law. This answer would depend on individual non-interventionist views on self-defense and gun rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, only for assault weapons

Non-interventionists may be divided on this issue. Some may support restrictions on assault weapons due to public safety concerns, while others may oppose such restrictions due to their preference for limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole

Non-interventionists may be divided on closing the gun show loophole. Some may see it as a reasonable measure to ensure background checks are consistently applied, while others may view it as an unnecessary government intervention in private transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Non-interventionism primarily focuses on foreign policy and avoiding involvement in other countries' affairs. However, it generally leans towards limited government intervention in domestic issues as well. While not completely opposed to restrictions, non-interventionists may be skeptical of increased government control over gun purchases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Non-interventionists may oppose strict background checks, psychological testing, and training requirements for gun purchases, as these measures could be seen as excessive government intervention and a potential infringement on individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all guns from public use

Banning all guns from public use would be strongly opposed by non-interventionists, as it represents a significant government intrusion into individual rights and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.