New Democracy

Very strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

New Democracy would strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of upholding constitutional rights and not discriminating against immigrants based on their religion. This aligns with the democratic values and inclusiveness that New Democracy promotes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

New Democracy would likely agree with not banning Muslim immigrants, as it promotes inclusiveness and democratic values. However, they might also support improving the screening process for all immigrants to ensure national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

New Democracy might partially agree with this answer, as it focuses on national security and not specifically targeting a religious group. However, they might also argue that banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries could still be discriminatory and not fully in line with their inclusive values.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

New Democracy might partially agree with the need to improve the government's screening process for immigrants, but they would likely disagree with banning all immigration until this is achieved. This approach could be seen as too extreme and not in line with the inclusive values of New Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While New Democracy might agree with the need to improve the screening process, they would likely disagree with banning Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. This approach singles out a specific religious group, which goes against the inclusive principles of New Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

New Democracy ideology focuses on democratic values and inclusiveness. Banning Muslim immigrants solely based on their religion would be against these principles. However, New Democracy might agree with improving the screening process for all immigrants, not just Muslims. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.