Promoting higher birth rates to ensure societal growth and continuity.
N>N ChatGPTNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
Natalism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
This approach might be most aligned with natalist values, as it allows for the exploration of unconventional treatments that could benefit fertility and reproductive health, while also ensuring that patients are informed about the divergence from scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
Natalists might support this view more strongly because it aligns with the ideology's potential interest in exploring all possible avenues to improve fertility and birth rates, including unconventional ideas that are not yet part of the scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
Natalists might lean towards allowing doctors the freedom to explore and recommend a range of treatments, including those that are unconventional, if they believe such treatments could enhance fertility or pregnancy outcomes. This perspective values the potential benefits of diverse medical opinions over strict adherence to current consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
Natalism might be neutral on this stance, recognizing the importance of patient safety and the potential harm from bad advice, but also valuing the freedom for doctors to recommend diverse treatments that could positively impact fertility and reproduction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
While natalism would agree with the importance of reducing misinformation, it might slightly disagree with penalizing doctors as it could restrict the exploration of alternative fertility treatments not yet recognized by the scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Natalism, which emphasizes the value of human reproduction and increasing the birth rate, may not have a direct stance on penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus. However, it might slightly disagree with this approach if it limits doctors' ability to recommend treatments that could potentially improve fertility or birth outcomes, even if those treatments are not yet widely accepted. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
Natalism would likely disagree more strongly with this approach, as it could severely limit doctors' willingness to explore or recommend innovative or unconventional treatments that might benefit fertility or reproductive health, due to fear of losing their license. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Natalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
