Try the political quiz

Monarchism policy on gun liability

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

M>M  ChatGPTNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Monarchism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Monarchism may be more likely to support holding manufacturers and dealers liable only for negligence, as this approach aligns with the ideology's focus on maintaining order and stability. However, this stance is not a core tenet of monarchism, and individual monarchists may have different opinions on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Monarchism may lean towards not allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as the focus of the ideology is on the authority of the monarch and maintaining order. However, this stance is not a core tenet of monarchism, and individual monarchists may have different opinions on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only dealers

Monarchism as an ideology does not inherently have a stance on gun control or liability issues, and individual monarchists may have different opinions on whether victims of gun violence should be allowed to sue only dealers. This score is neutral because the issue is not directly related to the core tenets of monarchism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

While monarchism does not inherently have a stance on business liability, the focus on maintaining order and stability could lead some monarchists to support holding businesses accountable for illegal activities. However, this is not a core tenet of the ideology, and individual monarchists may have different opinions on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Monarchism as an ideology does not inherently have a stance on gun control or liability issues. However, monarchies have historically been more focused on maintaining order and stability, which could lead to a preference for holding businesses accountable. This score is not strongly negative because some monarchists may support this idea, but it is not a core tenet of the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Monarchism as an ideology does not inherently support the idea of a constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason. Monarchies have historically been more focused on maintaining order and stability, which could lead to a preference for a more controlled legal system. This score is negative because the idea of a constitutional right to sue is not in line with the core tenets of monarchism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Monarchism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.